It hard to learn how to use the LLM semantically with the high-cost of query.
How might we first able to qualify the structure by which we write text-to-CAD prompts before ‘spending’ the expensive query budget?
Perhaps we might embed an window that can take a ‘test prompt’ and have a LLM generate a OpenSCAD, CadCad, Build123D… etc. code whereby the breadth of the interpreted prompt can be read by the user in-depth so they might learn if they are providing too little or too much detail in their prompts
For example, I can use codelets like:
// Parameters for the cylinder tank vessel
radius = 1167.54; // mm
height = 2335.09; // mm
// Cylinder creation
cylinder(h = height, r = radius, $fn = 100);
in the OpenSCAD Cloud from Autodrop3d browser viewer to quickly verify that the codelet works